Skip to content Skip to footer
Site Search
Services Industries Issues About us Events (de) Careers

More

Menu

Services
Services
Advisory Audit Tax Consulting

Menu

Services
Advisory
Consulting Deals

Menu

Services
Audit
Audit of financial reporting Cybersecurity Risk Assurance Solutions

Menu

Services
Tax Consulting
Accounting and Tax Compliance Corporate Tax Financial Services Indirect Tax Legal Services Mergers and Acquisitions People and Organisation Private Wealth Specials Tax Controversy Tax Reporting & Strategy, Tax Technology Transfer Pricing

Featured

Sustainability - ESG

Menu

Industries
Industries
Automotive Capital Projects & Infrastructure Energy Sector Family Business Financial Services Pharma and Healthcare Retail and Consumer Goods Manufactoring Public Sector Real Estate & Construction Technology, Media and Telecommunications Transport & Logistics

Menu

Industries
Automotive

Menu

Industries
Capital Projects & Infrastructure

Menu

Industries
Energy Sector

Menu

Industries
Family Business

Menu

Industries
Financial Services

Menu

Industries
Pharma and Healthcare

Menu

Industries
Retail and Consumer Goods

Menu

Industries
Manufactoring

Menu

Industries
Public Sector

Menu

Industries
Real Estate & Construction

Menu

Industries
Technology, Media and Telecommunications

Menu

Industries
Transport & Logistics

Featured

Real Estate & Construction

Family Business

Menu

Issues
Issues
Customer Centric Transformation Cybersecurity DAC 6 Finance Transformation Augmented and Virtual Reality Sustainability - ESG 26th Global CEO Survey

Menu

Issues
Customer Centric Transformation

Menu

Issues
Cybersecurity

Menu

Issues
DAC 6

Menu

Issues
Finance Transformation

Menu

Issues
Augmented and Virtual Reality

Menu

Issues
Sustainability - ESG

Menu

Issues
26th Global CEO Survey

Featured

Cybersecurity

26th Global CEO Survey

Menu

About us
About us
Partner Press (de) Newsletter (de) Publications (de) Locations Corporate Responsibility Code of conduct Contact Transparency Report Alumni

Menu

About us
Partner

Menu

About us
Press (de)

Menu

About us
Newsletter (de)

Menu

About us
Publications (de)

Menu

About us
Locations

Menu

About us
Corporate Responsibility

Menu

About us
Code of conduct

Menu

About us
Contact

Menu

About us
Transparency Report

Menu

About us
Alumni

Menu

Events (de)
Events (de)

Menu

Careers
Careers
Experienced Professionals Graduates Students Why PwC Working for PwC Your Application

Menu

Careers
Experienced Professionals

Menu

Careers
Graduates

Menu

Careers
Students

Menu

Careers
Why PwC

Menu

Careers
Working for PwC

Menu

Careers
Your Application

Loading Results

No Match Found

The time to deal with DAC 6 is now!

The European Union is increasing transparency to identify potentially aggressive tax planning models. We support you to fulfil your reporting obligations in line with EU requirements (DAC 6).

Copy link Link copied to clipboard

Featured - 3 items

DAC 6 Pulse

International DAC 6 newsletter

Videos

Find out more about DAC 6 with these videos

Get in touch!

Our experts provide support on DAC 6 issues

DAC 6 – What’s it all about?

The European Union is increasing transparency to identify potentially aggressive tax planning models.

The amended provisions of EU Directive 2011/16/EU, which concerns mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements (referred to as “DAC 6”), have significant implications for taxpayers and tax advisors alike.

DAC 6 sets out reporting requirements for certain tax arrangements with cross-border features, provided that one or more of the hallmarks of such arrangements are fulfilled. Certain hallmarks which lead to a reporting requirement depend on one of the main benefits of the model being a tax advantage. The EU has developed a joint communication network (Common Communication Network, CCN) via which the mandatory automatic exchange of information in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements takes place. In Austria, this was implemented via the Austrian EU Reporting Requirement Act (EU-MPfG).

The Directive entered into force on 1 July 2020, but due to a retrospective reporting obligation also covered tax arrangements which were implemented after 25 June 2018. This is why you need to take action now!

Contact us!

What are the regulations?

DAC 6 in Poland

Overview of key information about DAC 6

  • Who
  • What
  • Why
  • How
  • Penalties
Who

DAC 6 primarily affects intermediaries such as tax consultants, accountants, banks and lawyers who design, market, organise, or implement tax arrangements with cross-border elements for their clients, or make such arrangements available for implementation, as well as persons who provide support and advice in this regard.

If the taxpayer independently organises tax arrangements (in-house) or uses the services of a consultant who is not subject to the provisions, the taxpayer is separately responsible for informing the tax authorities.

Thanks to a professional privilege, certified advisors who are subject to statutory confidentiality obligations are exempt from the reporting requirement if they inform the taxpayer and other intermediaries involved regarding the transfer of the reporting requirement.

 

Find out more
What

Mandatory reporting by intermediaries (or taxpayers) as well as automatic exchange of information between tax authorities in EU Member States via the common communication network (CCN) in relation to multiple cross-border tax arrangements, in which individuals or companies are involved.

Find out more
Why

The primary goals of DAC 6 are to strengthen tax transparency and combat aggressive tax planning. The changes largely implement elements of action 12 of the OECD BEPS project, which envisages mandatory disclosure obligations for potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements.

How

Intermediaries or taxpayers have to report potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements with a cross-border element to the tax authorities of the country in which they are resident. The information will then be shared by the respective EU Member State with all other Member States via the common communication network (CCN).

Find out more
Penalties

Intermediaries (or taxable persons) which do not fulfil the reporting obligation can expect to face penalties. The Austrian Fiscal Offences Act (FinStrG) deems DAC 6 breaches to be regulatory offences and envisages penalties of up to EUR 50,000 for intentional breaches, and up to EUR 25,000 for gross negligence (per tax planning arrangement). In other EU states, however, much higher penalties have been introduced. The highest are in Poland, where there is a maximum penalty of EUR 2.5m.

What does DAC 6 mean for me and my company?

Speak to our experts now!

Which tax planning arrangements need to be reported?

DAC 6 sets out reporting requirements for certain tax arrangements with cross-border features, provided that one or more of the hallmarks of such arrangements set out in the Directive are fulfilled. Some of these hallmarks further envisage that one of the main benefits of an arrangement is a tax saving. The EU has developed a joint communication network (Common Communication Network, CCN) via which the mandatory automatic exchange of information in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements takes place.

Click on a keyword to find out more
  • Tax arrangements
  • Hallmarks

Cross-border tax arrangements

An arrangement can be termed “cross-border” if it affects more than one EU Member State, or an EU Member State and a third country, and one of the following criteria is fulfilled:

  • Not all participants in the arrangement are tax resident in the same country.

  • One or more participants are tax resident in more than one country or do not have any tax residency.

  • One or more participants carries on its business through a permanent establishment situated in another country and the arrangement encompasses either a part or the whole of the business of that permanent establishment.

  • One or more participants carries on an activity in another country without being resident for tax purposes or creating a permanent establishment in that country. 

  • The arrangement potentially has an impact on the automatic exchange of information or the identification of the beneficial owners.

Hallmarks

Cross-border tax planning models need to be reported if they have at least one of the following hallmarks (selection from Austrian implementing legislation):

§5 EU-MPfG Unconditionally reportable arrangements – no main benefit test required

  • Cross-border payments within the group (e.g. if the recipient does not have tax residency or has tax residency in a jurisdiction on the EU/OECD “non-cooperative” list).

  • Deductions for the same depreciation on an asset are claimed in more than one jurisdiction.

  • Relief from double taxation for the same income or capital is claimed in more than one country.

  • Model to circumvent automatic exchange of information for financial accounts in OECD or EU states, or a model which serves to hide the ultimate beneficial owner (UBO)

  • Transfer pricing arrangements (e.g. for hard-to-value intangibles or when using unilateral “safe-harbour rules”).

 

§ 6 Conditionally reportable arrangements – the reporting obligation depends on the main benefit test (Is one of the main benefits of the arrangement a tax benefit?). 

  • The taxpayer is subject to a confidentiality clause.

  • The intermediary’s fee is linked (in whole or in part) to the tax benefit.

  • A “standardised” tax arrangement (tax model) exists for more than one taxpayer.

  • A model aimed at intentionally generating a loss

  • Converting income into capital, gifts or other low-taxed revenue

  • Circular transactions (“round tripping”)

  • Deductible cross-border payments within a group when the tax burden of the recipient is 0% or almost 0%, or for which a comprehensive tax exemption or a tax reduction applies.

SmartSurvey for DAC6

On 7 July 2020, the Austrian Ministry of Finance published a draft version of the information notice regarding the application of the Austrian EU Reporting Requirement Act (EU-MPfG). This indicates that the option envisaged on the EU level to postpone the entry into force of the DAC 6 Directive will not be used and the reporting deadlines laid out in the EU-MPfG will in principle remain unaffected. As the notice states, technical delays will cause a “de facto” postponement of the reporting requirement. The following deadlines must be observed:

  • 25 June 2018: Directive enters into force and transitional phase begins, i.e., intermediaries and taxpayers have to monitor the relevant cross-border tax arrangements in relation to which the first step in implementation was made between 25 June 2018 and 1 July 2020. 

  • The Directive was transposed into Austrian law on 22 October 2019 via the Austrian EU Reporting Requirement Act (EU-MPfG).

  • 24 June 2020: Amending Directive envisages an option to postpone the start of the reporting requirement by six months. Austria does not make use of this option.

  • July 2020: The EU-MPfG enters into force in Austria.

  • From October 2020: Possible to submit notifications regarding reportable arrangements via FinanzOnline

  • End of October 2020: Deadline for reporting tax arrangements implemented from 1 July 2021 (from the end of October 2020, the reporting deadline of 30 days set out in the EU-MPfG applies).

  • End of October 2020: Deadline for reporting tax arrangements which were implemented between 15 June 2018 and 01 July 2020 (retrospectively)

  • End of October 2020: first quarterly exchange between Member States

What needs to be reported?

The following information is covered by the reporting requirement:

  • intermediaries or relevant taxpayers

  • the hallmarks which triggered the reporting requirement

  • summary of the details of the reportable arrangement

  • date on which the first step towards implementation is intended to be made or was made

  • details regarding the respective national tax regulations on which the reportable arrangement is based

  • value of the reportable arrangement

  • Member States affected by the reportable arrangement

Who is affected by DAC6?

These new EU regulations affect anyone who develops, markets, organises, implements or provides tax arrangements with a cross-border element within the EU, as well as anyone who provides support and consulting in this regard. Both companies and individuals may be affected by the new rules. You can use the following table to check whether the rules are of relevance to you (basic scenarios):

Who is affected? Why? What are the effects?
Companies domiciled in the EU and/or which have permanent establishments in the EU Certain EU cross-border tax arrangements (developed in-house or together with consultants) are reportable. Reporting of certain tax arrangements to the local tax authorities – either by the advisor or the taxpayer
Tax advisors, lawyers, or consultants who coordinate certain tax arrangements Intermediaries include individuals who coordinate tax arrangements or offer support/consulting services in relation to them. EU taxpayers have to report certain tax arrangements to their local tax authorities.
Private individuals resident in the EU The structuring of deals or transactions on a cross-border basis may be reportable. Reporting of certain tax arrangements to the local tax authorities – either by the advisor or the taxpayer

How does it work?

The main steps in the process are as follows:

1 – Intermediaries who design, market, organise, implement, or facilitate reportable EU cross-border transactions or a series of transactions, as well as individuals who offer support or advice in this context.

2a – In accordance with the new EU guidelines, intermediaries must report “potentially aggressive tax arrangements” to the competent national tax authority.

2b – If the intermediary has not reported the model due to a professional privilege, the taxpayer is required to do so.

3 – The national tax authority will automatically share this information on a quarterly basis with the tax authority of the EU Member State in which the taxpayer is resident via the common communication network (CCN).

Reporting deadlines

The reportable tax arrangements must be reported within 30 days to the competent national authority. The reporting period begins either: 

  • on the day on which the arrangement is made available for implementation

  • or as soon as the arrangement can be implemented

  • or when the first step towards implementation is taken.

The decisive factor is which of the above events occurs first.

It is important to correctly assess the regulations and their effects. We look closely at the practical impact of the Directive and work closely with our clients as well as colleagues from the international PwC network. Do you have any questions or require support?

Get in touch!

Our publications keep you updated

{{filterContent.facetedTitle}}

{{contentList.dataService.numberHits}} {{contentList.dataService.numberHits == 1 ? 'result' : 'results'}}
{{contentList.loadingText}}

Playback of this video is not currently available

{{item.videoDuration}}

{{item.publishDate}}

{{item.title}}

{{item.videoDuration}}

{{item.publishDate}}

{{item.title}}

{{contentList.loadingText}}
{{contentList.loadMoreLabel}} {{contentList.viewAllLabel}}

Contact us

Richard Jerabek

Richard Jerabek

Partner, PwC Austria

Tel: +43 1 501 88-3431

Email
Hide
Services Industries Issues About us Careers Newsletter (de) Publications (de) Events (de)

© 2017 - 2023 PwC. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the PwC network and/or one or more of its member firms, each of which is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.

  • Imprint
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Information
  • Contact